EAN and UCL Relationship to Multi-criteria Model Analyzed by Idalin et al on Several National Roads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v15i1.657Keywords:
Road Safety Audit (AKJ), Equivalent Accident Number (EAN), National Roads, Accident-Prone Location (LRK), Multi Criteria Analysis, Accident Prediction, Probability, Upper Control Limit (UCL)Abstract
In Indonesia, to determine whether a road section is a crash-prone location (LRK), accident data from the local police is required, meaning that an accident needs to occur first. The Idalin et al (2018) method is a road safety audit (AKJ) method with a multi-criteria analysis model to calculate the probability (%) without using accident data, so that it can predict accidents based on 24 road geometric parameters and traffic characteristics. The purpose of the study was to determine the correlation of the Equivalent Accident Number (EAN) and Upper Control Limit (UCL) values to the Idalin et al (2018) Method. This research was conducted on 4 national roads with different characteristics in the form of function, class, area type and road terrain slope. The results of the study are that the greater the probability value, the greater the EAN and UCL values with a high positive correlation (r2> 0.82), and the weight of urban road accidents is influenced by traffic attributes (26-43%) and inter-city roads are influenced by cross-sectional conditions (23-28%).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Arif Arofah, Budi Hartanto Susilo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The use of non-commercial articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently approved at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows users to (1) Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium) or format; (2) Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material), for any purpose, even commercially.